| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
'Mathieu_Fery/feature/add_preserveGeneratedCPP_option'
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
APIs do support this feature
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
PrintWriter...)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
@SupportedSourceVersion back to 11
Behold, the issue as documented at commit 2d89df89453c099d4e357aa17eae88efcf1d1b70,
one build machine failing to compile SourceVersion.RELEASE_11
was due to an incomplete installation of openjdk-11-jdk on Debian GNU/Linux. Wow.
I have re-installed the openjdk-11-jre and openjdk-11-jdk packages on said machine,
ensured they are being used .. and it works.
Another note here regarding usage of OpenJDK11 compile time environment
and Java8 target. If using Eclipse, I had to set the system runtime JDK to JDK 8.
Otherwise the 'editor clean-up' jobs would run against the JDK 11
classes and wrongly so change certain type castings etc, incompatible with Java 8.
If anybody knows a solution here .. shoot.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Document Java8 target constraints, i.e. where we need to set source, target and bootclasspath
to ensure target runtime Java8 compliance.
Fix one odd compile issue!
Using two theorethical identical GNU/Linux Debian 10 machines with same set of installed software,
one passes (like MacOS, Windows) and one fails.
The failure was due to the CStructAnnotationProcessor's @SupportedSourceVersion tag.
This downgrades the SourceVersion's previous bump from 6->11 (commit 610493b1724b5d91327f478338ff5d029bdcc032)
down to 8.
Interesting times ..
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When annotations were placed on dummy Java variables, the annotation
processor was emitting a RenameJavaType directive into the gluegen
config file that caused the emitted file to be named boolean.java
instead of RenderingConfig.java or Pixel.java. Turned off this behavior
when jname is given in the @CStruct annotation. I'm uncertain how much
this processor is even used, since I can't find any occurrences of
@CStruct outside the test code for it in gluegen.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Enhances semantic exception in code generation
by adding the AST location of the type or function declaration.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
c47bc86ae2ee268a1f38c5580d11f93d7f8d6e74)
Code Clean-Up based on our Recommended Settings (jogamp-scripting c47bc86ae2ee268a1f38c5580d11f93d7f8d6e74)
- Change non static accesses to static members using declaring type
- Change indirect accesses to static members to direct accesses (accesses through subtypes)
- Add final modifier to private fields
- Add final modifier to method parameters
- Add final modifier to local variables
- Remove unnecessary casts
- Remove unnecessary '$NON-NLS$' tags
- Remove trailing white spaces on all lines
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
generated_class_user due to Java8 issues.
Java8's annotation processor as embedded within javac does not allow
referencing not-yet existing generated classes in a class source code
which will produce these generated classes via the annotation process.
Example:
+++
import com.jogamp.gluegen.structgen.CStruct;
public class Lala {
@CStruct(name="RenderingConfig", header="TestStruct01.h")
public RenderingConfig config;
}
+++
Above example illustrates that the type 'RenderingConfig'
does not exist at time of processing the annotation.
The type will be created via the annotation process itself.
Even though we pass '-proc:only', i.e. skip java compilation,
Java8's annotation processing via javac fails in such case.
We see this as a bug within javac's annotation processing itself!
+++
This workaround splits the annotation process and using the class as
generated by the former.
To allow this to work, CStruct receives a new field 'jname'
allowing to enforce the java-name of the structure
using a dummy field type like boolean.
@CStruct(name="RenderingConfig", jname="RenderingConfig", header="TestStruct01.h")
public boolean dummy;
Further more CStruct can be annotated on the package, i.e. 'package-info.java',
avoiding the dependency problem altogether.
To support multiple header files and types,
'CStructs' has been introduced using an array of 'CStruct'.
@CStructs({@CStruct(name="RenderingConfig", header="TestStruct01.h"), @CStruct(name="Pixel", header="TestStruct02.h")})
package com.jogamp.gluegen.test.junit.structgen;
Tests:
- Build w/ Java7 and Java8
- Validated 'major version 50' (Java 6) class files (OK)
|
| |
|
|
| |
This reverts commit fccb2460832aedd1b51372aa1e7881770cb638c9.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Updated the Java source version the annotation processor supports
to stop it from throwing a warning during the build process.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
calling 'PropertyAccess.isPropertyDefined(propName, default)' through Debug class.
Calling 'Debug.isPropertyDefined(propName, default)' may be 'optimized' to
'PropertyAccess.isPropertyDefined(propName, default)', which would skip the modules Debug's class initialization.
Iff that happens, an AccessControlException may happen, due to requesting an insecure property,
since modules own Debug class has not been added it's trusted prefixes from within it's init block yet.
This seems to be a bug of the JVM .. to me, however .. the above description is the only
able to explain the issue at hand.
+++
Fix calls Debug class own static methods, either Debug.initSingleton() or Debug.debug(),
before calling 'isPropertyDefined(propName, default)'.
+++
Also mark Debug class static methods final!
+++
|
| | |
|
|
|
'gluegen' C Structs on-the-fly (2-pass actually).
Convenient annotation processing (APT) hooked to 'javac' (1.6) via gluegen.jar META-INF
service provider 'javax.annotation.processing.Processor' -> 'com.jogamp.gluegen.structgen.CStructAnnotationProcessor'.
Am implicit APT / JAVAC would be possible, however - to have a proper process
the unit test utilizes an explicit 2 pass run:
<!-- Annotation Processor Only - First -->
<javac destdir="${build_t.java}">
<classpath refid="junit.compile.classpath"/>
<compilerarg value="-proc:only"/>
<compilerarg value="-J-Djogamp.gluegen.structgen.debug"/>
<compilerarg value="-J-Djogamp.gluegen.structgen.output=${build_t.gen}/classes"/>
<src path="${test.base.dir}/com/jogamp/gluegen/test/junit/structgen"/>
</javac>
<!-- Javac Only - Second -->
<javac destdir="${build_t.java}">
<classpath refid="junit.compile.classpath"/>
<compilerarg value="-proc:none"/>
<src path="${test.base.dir}"/>
<src path="${build_t.gen}" />
</javac>
Original code from Michael Bien's 'superglue' git://github.com/mbien/superglue.git,
finally merged to GlueGen (as once intended).
Note: The APT javac pass requires to use 'gluegen.jar' instead of 'gluegen-rt.jar' !
The 2-pass process also alows using the runtime gluegen-rt.jar and hence ensures
clean namespace check at compilation.
|
